|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Arthur Flint <mra### [at] chesapeake net> wrote:
> Some people like the low overhead that DOS
> offers...
As much as I hate saying this, the Windows version works faster than the DOS
version.
I once thought that as in DOS POV-Ray has the whole machine to itself while
in windows it has to share resources and time with other processes, it would
be much faster in DOS.
Then one day I decided to test it in practice. To my big surprise POV-Ray
for Windows outperformed POV-Ray for DOS in almost every case. (And this was
with pov3.1, ie. no superoptimized intel compile available...)
So don't make the mistake of thinking that POV-Ray will be faster in DOS
just because there are less processes. That's not the only affecting thing.
--
#macro M(A,N,D,L)plane{-z,-9pigment{mandel L*9translate N color_map{[0rgb x]
[1rgb 9]}scale<D,D*3D>*1e3}rotate y*A*8}#end M(-3<1.206434.28623>70,7)M(
-1<.7438.1795>1,20)M(1<.77595.13699>30,20)M(3<.75923.07145>80,99)// - Warp -
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |